Category Archives: Politics

Why do evangelical Christians like Romney? Why do civil libertarians like Obama? Who you gonna believe?

Tom Bissell is the author of several books. His most recent is “Magic Hours: Essays on Creators and Creation.” He is writing a series of columns for Yahoo! News about the closing days of campaign 2012. Here’s a quote below, and follow the link for the full article.

“Most of us assume that our vote for our chosen candidate accurately–or at least tolerably–represents our beliefs. In truth, though, our politics frequently violate the coherence of our beliefs.”

http://news.yahoo.com/why-do-evangelical-christians-like-romney–why-do-civil-libertarians-like-obama–who-you-gonna-believe-.html

Romney, The Product

 

By E.J. Dionne – October 15, 2012

“Romney, Ryan and the entire right know that their most deeply held belief – the one on which they won’t compromise — is rejected by the vast majority of Americans. That’s their faith that every problem in the economy and in society can be solved by throwing more money at rich people through tax cuts.”

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/10/15/romney_the_product_115770.html

5 ways to watch presidential debates without panicking

by | October 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM

 

Tonight’s presidential debate is being billed by the media as The Most Important Moment of President Barack Obama’s Political Life … Period. (Well, aside from a little thing called The Entire 2008 Election, in which a black guy named Barack Hussein Obama attempted to beat a war hero and become the first black president of the United States, but I digress…)

In reality, the extent to which Obama’s re-election chances hinge on tonight’s second presidential debate has more to do with the media than with the public, since something like 95 percent of voters have already made up their minds, and close to 1 in 10 people in key swing states like Florida and Ohio have already voted.

That said, the debate matters, since the media says it matters, and because what the headlines tomorrow say about the debate can tend to drive public opinion after the debate, and that has real implications for voter enthusiasm, and therefore, the outcome of the election.

Some commentators have objected to this, including MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell, who has suggested the debates should be completely reconfigured, allowing the candidates to bring in notes and eliminating the moderator entirely.

Others, like statistical modeling guru Nate Silver of the New York TimesFiveThirtyEight blog have suggested making the media take a 24-hour timeout after any debate before weighing in, thus allowing public opinion to form on its own before the press weighs in.

Those are good ideas, but in the meantime, how can the average voter watch the debates without losing their mind? Here are five suggestions:

1. Watch by yourself (or with someone really quiet).

In this age of ego-reinforcing media that tends to tell you exactly what you already believe, and since most people tune out all sources that don’t, having a bunch of like-minded, potentially inebriated people in a bar or in your living room, yelling at the TV along with you will only further bias your reaction to the debate, and possibly give you a headache. Instead, retire to a quiet room in your home (or as Mitt Romney would say, your “apartment”) and consult your own conscience as to how things went. Of course, once you’ve given yourself a few minutes to reflect, turn on MSNBC immediately. (Or Fox, if you’re a conservative. Or CNN if you really don’t care one way or the other.) That way, you’ll still have your sanity, but at least you’ll know what everyone else is talking about around the water cooler tomorrow.

2. Keep Twitter handy (or Facebook, if you prefer).

It’s more fun and less stressful to get the snarky reactions to what’s happening on the TV screen directly from @BillMaher or @SamuelLJackson in real time, instead of having to wait to find out what they thought on Real Time later in the week. Also, not everyone can afford HBO.

3. Don’t believe the snap polls.

For one thing, they’re almost always of relatively low quality compared to a normal poll. For instance, the CNN instant poll taken after the first presidential debate significantly oversampled white southerners, which of course produced a big win for Mitt Romney. And because the sample sizes in the polls are small, and the samples often self-selected rather than scientifically chosen, they tend to have a “lean.” Ignore them entirely, and wait for the first set of real poll numbers to come out about three days after the debate, since those will take into account at least three full days of viewer/voter reactions.

4. Remember that debates are like NFL playoff games — most people watching are rooting for one team.

One thing that all of the polls have in common is that they show very few “undecided” voters. The American electorate is as partisan as it has been, well, ever. That means that something like 90 percent of Democrats and Republicans are voting their party line, and the vast majority of debate viewers are tuning in to see their guy wallop the competition, not to have their minds swayed. So understand that no matter who the majority of people and reporters believe wins the debate, the performance of either candidate is unlikely to change many votes.

5. Don’t blame the moderator.

No moderator can help or hurt a candidate during a debate. They are part facilitator, part theatrical prop. If your candidate loses, it’s their fault, not Martha Raddatz’s, or Candy Crowley’s, or poor, poor Jim Lehrer’s. Still, critiquing the moderator’s performance is a time-honored debate tradition, and will definitely make the experience more fun for you, the viewer. So snark away, at everything from their passiveness or aggressiveness to their interruptions or lack thereof.

But please, be polite. Tweeting ugly things to a moderator during or after the debate is just rude, and makes you a bad person. So if you don’t have anything nice to say, say it on MySpace. That way nobody but your lamest friends will know.

Follow Joy Reid on Twitter at @thereidreport

VP Debate – Biden Won!

 

Joe Biden gave us a clinic on how to debate last night. Know your facts: Biden was on top of the data and had real substance to refute the lies of the Romney/Ryan campaign. Be passionate: Biden displayed his passion repeatedly for the Middle Class. Amplify your opponents weakness: Biden hit on all the mendacity and weaknesses of the RR ticket, e.g., Romney’s 47% comments, the 20% tax cut that the RR campaign will not detail how they’ll pay for it (unidentified tax loopholes and deductions) and most importantly, Medicare. Ryan’s plan turns Medicare into a voucher program. Yes, Mr. Vice President we trust the President with Medicare. Lastly, throw the occasional curve ball: Biden revealed that Ryan requested stimulus money not once, but twice because he said he needed to create jobs in Wisconsin. Ryan’s a hypocrite.  Last night was a win for Biden, Democrats and the country. Of course, Republicans are dervishing about Ryan’s performance, but Biden clearly proved that he is the Vice President and should keep the job.

Memo to Democrats: ‘Chill’ the [bleep] out, people

Jonathan Capehart’s Opinion Post in the Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/memo-to-democrats-chill-the-bleep-out-people/2012/10/10/5c36f61e-12f8-11e2-ba83-a7a396e6b2a7_blog.html

“This race began as a toss up. It is now a toss up,” my colleague calmly writes. “Barring some unforeseen event, it will remain a toss up until the end. Which it was always going to be from the start.”

 

Slave states vs. free states, 2012

This article by Michael Lind in Salon.com gets to the real matter of the Southern Strategy. It’s not just about race, it’s about class and caste as well.

http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/slave_states_vs_free_states_2012/

“The traditional Southern regional economic strategy, then, depends on the control by Southern employers of a huge pool of low-wage workers with little or no bargaining power in their dealings with their local bosses or the foreign (that is, extra-Southern) investors and corporations who are invited in to exploit their labor.”